Mahatma Gandhi, one of history’s most influential advocates of non-violence, had a complex and transformative relationship with Christianity. Though he remained a devout Hindu throughout his life, Gandhi’s encounter with the teachings of Jesus Christ, particularly the Sermon on the Mount, profoundly shaped his philosophy of Satyagraha and non-violent resistance. His journey from initial repulsion to deep reverence for Christ’s message offers valuable insights into how spiritual wisdom can transcend religious boundaries.
Table of Contents
- Initial repulsion and a turning point
- The heart-striking impact of the Sermon on the Mount
- Connection with the Bhagavad Gita and Shamal Bhatt
- Jesus as a world teacher and prince of passive resisters
- The practical application of Christ’s teachings
- Gandhi’s view on prayer and worship
- Integration into ashram life
- A picture of Christ in Gandhi’s hut
Initial repulsion and a turning point
Gandhi’s earliest impressions of Christianity were decidedly negative. Growing up in Gujarat, his exposure to the religion came through aggressive missionary activities that left a lasting impression. In his autobiography, Gandhi recalls how Christian missionaries would stand near his high school, “pouring abuse on Hindus and their Gods.” This single experience was enough to dissuade him from any further engagement with the faith.
Adding to his aversion was news of a well-known Hindu converting to Christianity. According to Gandhi’s recollections, the convert reportedly had to eat beef, drink liquor, adopt English dress including a hat, and began criticizing his ancestral religion and customs. For the young vegetarian Gandhi, raised in a deeply religious Hindu family, these associations between Christianity, meat-eating, and cultural abandonment created a strong dislike for the religion.
The turning point came during Gandhi’s stay in London as a law student in 1888. Through his theosophical contacts and friendships formed at vegetarian boarding houses, he met devout Christians who defied his earlier stereotypes. A good Christian from Manchester, whom Gandhi met at a hotel, particularly influenced him. When Gandhi confessed his aversion to Christianity, the man responded by pointing out that he himself was a vegetarian and did not drink, and that neither meat-eating nor drinking was enjoined by scripture. He then asked Gandhi to read the Bible.
The heart-striking impact of the Sermon on the Mount
Gandhi began reading the Bible, starting with the Old Testament. The experience was not encouraging. He found parts of it tedious, particularly the Book of Numbers, which he describes as sending him to sleep. He plodded through it merely to fulfill his promise to his Christian friend, finding much of it confusing and even repulsive with its frequent accounts of warfare and vengeance.
But the New Testament produced an entirely different impression. When Gandhi reached the Sermon on the Mount in chapters five through seven of Matthew’s Gospel, something remarkable happened. As he himself described it, the Sermon went straight to his heart. The verses on non-resistance particularly captivated him, especially Matthew 5:39, which teaches that if someone strikes you on your right cheek, you should turn to them the other also.
Connection with the Bhagavad Gita and Shamal Bhatt
What made the Sermon on the Mount resonate so powerfully with Gandhi was its alignment with teachings he had already absorbed. As a child, Gandhi had been deeply influenced by a didactic stanza from the medieval Gujarati poet Shamal Bhatt. The poem taught that one should return good for evil, offering a goodly meal for a bowl of water and giving back tenfold any kindness received. Its concluding message, that “the truly noble know all men as one, and return with gladness good for evil done,” had gripped Gandhi’s mind and heart from an early age.
When Gandhi later encountered the Sermon on the Mount, he immediately recognized the same essential teaching. He compared Jesus’s instruction to turn the other cheek with Bhatt’s immortal lines about returning good for evil. Gandhi noted that the teaching of the Sermon echoed something he had learned in childhood, something that seemed to be part of his very being.
Simultaneously, Gandhi was studying the Bhagavad Gita, and he found remarkable harmony between these sacred texts. He saw the Sermon and the Gita as mutually complementary, stating that what the Sermon describes in a graphic manner, the Gita reduces to scientific formula. Gandhi went so far as to declare that if he were deprived of the Gita but had a copy of the Sermon, he would derive the same joy from it. For him, renunciation was the highest form of religion, and both texts pointed toward this truth through different cultural expressions.
Jesus as a world teacher and prince of passive resisters
Gandhi’s admiration for Jesus grew to be immense, though it took a distinctive form. He called Jesus “one of the greatest teachers humanity has ever had” and considered him a beautiful example of the perfect man. But Gandhi’s interpretation went beyond conventional Christian understanding.
Most uniquely, Gandhi viewed Jesus through the lens of political and moral resistance. He described Jesus as “a prince among politicians” and “a prince among passive resisters,” emphasizing the strategic brilliance of Christ’s approach to confronting injustice. For Gandhi, Jesus was “the most active resister known perhaps to history” whose non-violence was “par excellence.”
This interpretation highlighted the moral strength and practical efficacy of Jesus’s teachings rather than treating them as otherworldly idealism. Gandhi saw in Christ’s example the revolutionary potential of refusing to retaliate, of absorbing suffering rather than inflicting it, and of winning over enemies through love rather than force. The example of Jesus’s suffering became, in Gandhi’s words, “a factor in the composition of my undying faith in non-violence which rules all my actions.”
The practical application of Christ’s teachings
Where many Christian theologians emphasized the impossibility or purely spiritual nature of the Sermon on the Mount, Gandhi insisted on its practical applicability. He was troubled when he heard Christians dismiss the Sermon as impractical or merely dreamy idealism. Gandhi believed that what was lived as Christianity often represented a negation of the Sermon on the Mount.
Gandhi’s philosophy of Satyagraha, which he developed first in South Africa and later applied in India’s independence struggle, was directly influenced by Christ’s teachings. The concept of non-violent resistance, of opposing injustice through soul-force rather than physical force, drew heavily from his understanding of the Sermon. As Gandhi himself acknowledged, it was the New Testament that awakened him to the rightness and value of passive resistance.
Gandhi’s view on prayer and worship
Gandhi’s understanding of prayer was equally influenced by Jesus’s teachings, particularly Christ’s instruction on sincere, private communion with God. Jesus taught his followers to pray in secret, entering into their inner chamber and shutting the door, rather than praying publicly to be seen by others. This teaching resonated deeply with Gandhi’s own spirituality.
Gandhi emphasized that worship performed with the lips while hearts remained impure would never be heard by God. He believed true prayer springs from the heart, not from eloquent words or public displays. For him, prayer was an act of self-purification, a conversation with the Divine presence that dwells within each person.
Gandhi stressed the importance of individual and solitary prayer over mere congregational participation. He taught that one who never prays alone would not derive much benefit from group prayers. Prayer, in his understanding, was about concentrating one’s attention on the object of worship so completely that nothing else remains in consciousness, much like a lover forgets the whole world in the presence of the beloved.
Integration into ashram life
Perhaps the most tangible demonstration of Gandhi’s reverence for Christianity came in the daily practices of his ashrams. Gandhi consciously created spaces of interfaith harmony where followers of all religions were welcome. The morning and evening prayers at his ashrams included readings from multiple sacred traditions.
The Ashram Bhajanavali, the hymnal compiled for ashram use, contained bhajans from Muslim Sufis and fakirs, from Guru Nanak, and from the Christian hymnary. As Gandhi noted, every religion seemed to have found a natural setting in this prayer book. The typical Christian prayer from the Sermon on the Mount was recited alongside Hindu verses and Islamic prayers.
This was not mere religious eclecticism but a lived expression of Gandhi’s belief that all religions contained the same essential truth expressed in different forms. He famously declared that he was as much a Muslim, Christian, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, and Parsee as he was Hindu. The hands that serve, he often said, are holier than the lips that pray.
A picture of Christ in Gandhi’s hut
When Louis Fischer, Gandhi’s biographer, visited the Sewagram Ashram in 1942, he noticed something striking. On the mud walls of Gandhi’s simple hut, there was only one decoration: a black and white print of Jesus Christ with the inscription “He is our peace.” When Fischer asked about it, Gandhi replied that he was a Christian, and a Hindu, and a Muslim, and a Jew. Looking at all religions with an equal eye, Gandhi believed it his duty to blend into his faith every acceptable feature of other traditions.
Gandhi’s message to Christians was ultimately a call to authentic living. He urged them to become worthy of the message embedded in the Sermon on the Mount, often noting that a rose does not need to preach but simply spreads its fragrance. For Gandhi, the gospel of Christ was even more subtle and fragrant than that of the rose and should be imparted in an even quieter, more imperceptible manner through the witness of transformed lives.
What do you think? How might Gandhi’s ability to find spiritual wisdom across religious boundaries inspire more harmonious interfaith dialogue today? And what would it mean for religious communities to focus more on living their teachings than preaching them?
References
- https://www.mkgandhi.org/articles/gandhi_christ.html
- https://www.mkgandhi.org/articles/mahatma-gandhi-and-sermon-on-the-mount.html
- https://publicseminar.org/2018/12/mahatma-gandhi-what-jesus-means-to-me/
- https://christianethicstoday.com/wp/jesus-and-gandhi-a-study-in-commonalities/
- https://www.gandhi-manibhavan.org/educational-resources/Satyagraha-v-passive-resistance.html
- https://www.mkgandhi.org/africaneedsgandhi/gandhis_message_to_christians.php
- https://www.gandhi-manibhavan.org/gandhian-philosophy/philosophy-religion-prayerinashram.html
Leave a Reply