The story of science and technology in colonial India is one of deliberate design and strategic omissions. British rulers didn’t ignore science-they invested in it carefully, but their investments served specific purposes: extracting resources, consolidating political control, and feeding the industrial machine back home. Yet within this restrictive framework, Indian intellectuals and visionaries built institutions that would eventually become the foundations of independent India’s scientific enterprise.
Table of Contents
- Colonial exploitation and selective scientific investment
- The myth of benevolent development
- The rise of English education: Hindu College and Presidency Colleges
- A cradle for India’s intellectual renaissance
- Founding of pioneering research institutions
- Jamsetji Tata’s vision: the Indian Institute of Science
- Seeds of strategic science: TIFR and CSIR
- TIFR: birthplace of India’s atomic program
- Agricultural research for colonial economy
- Commodity committees and research stations
- The colonial legacy and beyond
Colonial exploitation and selective scientific investment
The British colonial administration treated science as a tool for empire-building. Railways, roads, canals, and telegraph lines were rapidly developed-not for Indian welfare, but to transport raw materials like cotton, coal, and iron from India’s interior to ports for shipment to England. The Great Trigonometrical Survey, established in 1818, meticulously mapped India’s terrain and natural resources, providing colonial administrators with detailed knowledge for resource extraction.
Exploratory projects termed “field sciences”-geography, geology, and botany-received substantial funding because they helped identify mineral deposits, catalogued exploitable flora, and supported plantation agriculture. Meanwhile, fundamental sciences like physics and chemistry, which could have built indigenous industrial capacity, received minimal attention. The colonial pattern was clear: develop sciences that served imperial economic interests while keeping Indians dependent on British manufactured goods.
The myth of benevolent development
Colonial apologists often point to infrastructure like railways as Britain’s “gift” to India. The reality is more complex. The railway network was designed primarily for commercial exploitation, with government-guaranteed returns paid from Indian taxpayers’ money while British shareholders profited. By the late 19th century, the rush of technology was changing India’s agricultural economy, with large fractions of raw materials and even food grains being exported to distant markets. Many small farmers lost their land, animals, and equipment to moneylenders, contributing to devastating famines that killed millions.
The rise of English education: Hindu College and Presidency Colleges
The establishment of the Supreme Court of Calcutta in 1773 created new opportunities for English-educated Indians. This sparked a growing demand for Western education among Bengal’s Hindu elite. On January 20, 1817, Hindu College (later renamed Presidency College) was formally opened in Calcutta with just 20 students. It became the earliest institution of higher learning in the modern sense in Asia.
The college emerged from the combined efforts of Raja Ram Mohan Roy, David Hare, and several prominent Bengali families. The purpose was to establish an institution for giving a liberal education to children of the Hindu community. The original curriculum included English, Bengali, Sanskrit, History, Geography, Mathematics, Chemistry, and other sciences. In 1855, the college was divided-the “Pathshala” part became Hindu School, while the “Mahapathshala” became Presidency College.
A cradle for India’s intellectual renaissance
Presidency College produced remarkable scientific talent. Jagadish Chandra Bose and Prafulla Chandra Ray made pioneering discoveries in physics, plant physiology, and chemistry in its laboratories. Alumni like S.N. Bose, M.N. Saha, P.C. Mahalanobis, and Amartya Sen made world-class contributions across various fields. The college stood firmly for modern, Western education delivered in English, playing a pivotal role in shaping modern Indian intellectual discourse.
Founding of pioneering research institutions
The Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science (IACS), founded on July 29, 1876, by Dr. Mahendra Lal Sircar, represented a bold attempt to create indigenous research capabilities. A prominent homeopathic doctor, Sircar envisioned a public, community-funded institution to foster Indian-led scientific research at a time when such opportunities were severely limited under colonial rule.
IACS became the only place in India where higher research in physical sciences could be carried out during the early decades of the twentieth century. Students from across India assembled in Calcutta to work in its creative atmosphere. Most famously, C.V. Raman discovered the celebrated Raman Effect here in 1928, winning India’s first Nobel Prize in Science in 1930. Other luminaries who worked at IACS included K.S. Krishnan, M.N. Saha, and S.N. Bose.
Jamsetji Tata’s vision: the Indian Institute of Science
While IACS focused on pure research, industrialist Jamsetji Nusserwanji Tata conceived a different kind of institution. Tata envisioned a university of science in 1896 that would work for the benefit of India. After a chance meeting with Swami Vivekananda on a ship in 1893, where they discussed India’s need for industrial and scientific development, Tata began working towards establishing a premier research institute.
The Indian Institute of Science was formally established on May 27, 1909, through a tripartite venture involving the Tatas, the Government of India, and the Maharaja of Mysore, who donated over 370 acres of land in Bangalore. Sadly, Tata died in 1904, never seeing his vision realized. The institute started with just two departments-General and Applied Chemistry and Electrical Technology-but would grow to become India’s premier research university. Nobel laureate C.V. Raman later became its first Indian director.
Seeds of strategic science: TIFR and CSIR
The exigencies of World War II accelerated India’s scientific institution-building. The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) came into operation on September 26, 1942, modeled on Britain’s Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. Arcot Ramasamy Mudaliar became instrumental in CSIR’s creation, and Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar was appointed as its first Director, later earning the title “Father of Research Laboratories in India.”
CSIR was established to promote scientific knowledge and boost industrialization, initially focusing on developing synthetic substitutes for scarce wartime imports. By 1943, the governing body approved establishing five national laboratories, including the National Chemical Laboratory, National Physical Laboratory, and National Metallurgical Laboratory. The Tata Industrial House contributed significantly to these efforts.
TIFR: birthplace of India’s atomic program
In 1944, while anticolonial leaders like Nehru were still in prison, physicist Homi J. Bhabha approached the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust with a proposal to fund a research institute in fundamental physics. With support from J.R.D. Tata, the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) was founded on June 1, 1945, with Bhabha as its first director.
TIFR initially operated within the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore before relocating to Bombay. It became the cradle of India’s atomic energy program, with early work of the Atomic Energy Commission beginning here. The institute represented Bhabha’s conviction that India needed modern facilities matching those of the West, staffed by Indian scientists with the freedom to pursue fundamental research.
Agricultural research for colonial economy
The Imperial Council of Agricultural Research was established on July 16, 1929, following recommendations from the Royal Commission on Agriculture appointed in 1926. The Commission, chaired by Lord Linlithgow, proposed this central coordinating body to address deepening crises in Indian agriculture and food security.
However, the colonial focus was primarily on cash crops and revenue extraction rather than farmer welfare. The British encouraged Indian farmers to grow cotton, jute, indigo, tea, and opium-crops in high demand in Britain. The shift from food crops to cash crops contributed to disaster in famine years, as agriculture that had previously met local needs was now controlled from afar with the goal of profit rather than subsistence.
Commodity committees and research stations
The Imperial Agricultural Research Institute, established in 1905 at Pusa in Bihar, conducted research primarily benefiting plantation agriculture and export-oriented crops. Commodity committees were formed for crops like cotton, jute, sugarcane, tobacco, and tea-all valuable exports to Britain. Indigenous food security took a backseat to colonial commercial interests. Between 1850 and 1899, India suffered 24 major famines-more than in any other recorded 50-year period-resulting in millions of deaths, often caused not by lack of production but by policies that exported grain even during shortages.
The colonial legacy and beyond
The institutions established during the colonial period tell a contradictory story. On one hand, the British deliberately shaped scientific development to serve imperial interests, neglecting fundamental sciences and indigenous capabilities. On the other hand, Indian intellectuals and philanthropists like Mahendra Lal Sircar, Jamsetji Tata, and Homi Bhabha created institutions that would become the backbone of independent India’s scientific enterprise.
The scientists trained at Presidency College, IACS, IISc, and other institutions didn’t just conduct research-they built the intellectual and institutional infrastructure that would eventually enable India’s post-independence scientific achievements, from nuclear energy to space exploration. The selective development of science under colonialism inadvertently created spaces where Indian scientific nationalism could flourish.
What do you think? How might India’s scientific trajectory have differed if colonial investment had prioritized fundamental sciences rather than extraction-oriented fields? And what lessons from this period of selective development remain relevant for science policy in developing nations today?
References
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Raj
- https://www.routledge.com/Science-and-Technology-in-Colonial-India/Mohan/p/book/9781032364803
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_University,_Kolkata
- https://www.presiuniv.ac.in/web/presidency_history.php
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_School,_Kolkata
- https://www.iacs.res.in/
- https://dst.gov.in/autonomousstinstitutions/indian-association-cultivation-science-kolkata
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Association_for_the_Cultivation_of_Science
- https://www.iisc.ac.in/about/general-information/about-heritage/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Institute_of_Science
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Scientific_and_Industrial_Research
- https://www.britannica.com/topic/Council-of-Scientific-and-Industrial-Research
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homi_J._Bhabha
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata_Institute_of_Fundamental_Research
- https://www.tata.com/community/education/tata-institute-of-fundamental-research-tifr
- https://grokipedia.com/page/Indian_Council_of_Agricultural_Research
- https://agriculture.institute/indian-agricultural-development/agricultural-development-india-pre-independence/
- https://www.environmentandsociety.org/exhibitions/famines-india/changing-land-ownership-agricultural-and-economic-systems
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256495801_History_of_agricultural_research_in_India
Leave a Reply