Apartheid stands as one of history’s most notorious systems of institutionalized racial oppression. The term, derived from the Afrikaans word meaning “separateness” or “apart-hood,” defined the official policy of racial segregation enforced by South Africa’s National Party from 1948 until the early 1990s. But this system was not born overnight-it was built upon decades of discriminatory legislation that systematically stripped Black South Africans of their land, rights, and dignity.
Table of Contents
- The definition of apartheid as a crime against humanity
- Apartheid laws before 1948: the foundations of segregation
- The Glen Grey Act of 1894
- The Natives Land Act of 1913
- The 1910 South Africa Act and other early legislation
- Institutionalization of apartheid: major laws after 1948
- The Population Registration Act of 1950
- The Group Areas Act of 1950
- Laws controlling relationships and daily life
- The Reservation of Separate Amenities Act of 1953
- The Bantu Education Act of 1953
- The Bantustan strategy and forced removals
- The Bantu Authorities Act of 1951
- The Bantu Homelands Citizenship Act of 1970
- Massive forced removals
The definition of apartheid as a crime against humanity
The international community formally condemned apartheid through the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 30 November 1973. This convention was groundbreaking-it became the first binding international treaty to declare apartheid and racial segregation as crimes under international law. The convention entered into force on 18 July 1976, and as of today, 110 states have ratified it.
Under this convention, apartheid was defined as inhuman acts committed to establish and maintain domination by one racial group over another. These acts included murder, torture, arbitrary arrest, illegal imprisonment, exploitation, marginalization, and persecution. The convention was particularly notable for departing from traditional rules of state sovereignty-it authorized national courts of member states to hold individuals criminally responsible for apartheid, including government leaders and their supporters.
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, adopted in 1998 and entering into force in 2002, further reinforced this legal framework. It defined the crime of apartheid as inhumane acts committed within an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over another.
Apartheid laws before 1948: the foundations of segregation
Long before the National Party formally institutionalized apartheid in 1948, South African laws had already established a framework of racial discrimination. The roots of land dispossession and segregation stretch back to the colonial era, with British colonial pass laws restricting Black movement as early as the 19th century.
The Glen Grey Act of 1894
One of the earliest significant pieces of segregationist legislation was the Glen Grey Act, drafted by Cecil John Rhodes in 1894. This act systematically limited the number of African people who could own land in designated areas. It applied the principle of “one man one plot” and used the law of primogeniture for inheritance. Crucially, it pushed those deemed unqualified to acquire land to leave their areas and seek work on farms or in other employment-essentially creating a labor pool for White-owned enterprises.
The Natives Land Act of 1913
Perhaps the most devastating pre-apartheid legislation was the Natives Land Act of 1913. This law defined less than one-tenth of South Africa as Black “reserves” and prohibited any purchase or lease of land by Black South Africans outside these areas. According to the South African government, this act limited African land ownership to just 7 percent of the country’s territory-later expanded to only 13 percent through the 1936 Native Trust and Land Act.
The consequences were immediate and devastating. Black South Africans were restricted from buying or occupying land except as employees of a white master. This opened the door for white ownership of 87 percent of the land, leaving Black people to struggle for what remained. The legislation prohibited Black people from buying or renting land in areas designated as “white” and paved the way for further restrictions on Black rights and land ownership.
The 1910 South Africa Act and other early legislation
The formation of the Union of South Africa in 1910 excluded Black people from meaningful political participation. The white minority government systematically denied voting rights to the Black majority, establishing a pattern that would continue for decades. Various provincial commissions during this period recommended strict land segregation, with Black people confined to designated reserves while White settlers claimed the most fertile territories.
Institutionalization of apartheid: major laws after 1948
The 1948 election brought the National Party to power under Daniel F. Malan, marking the formal institutionalization of apartheid. The party extended existing segregation policies and gave them the name “apartheid.”
The Population Registration Act of 1950
The Population Registration Act required every inhabitant of South Africa to be classified and registered according to racial characteristics. The population was divided into three basic categories: Black (also called Bantu or Native), White, and Coloured (mixed race). Indians were later added as a separate classification. An Office for Race Classification was established to oversee this process, using criteria such as physical appearance, general acceptance, and social standing. This racial classification would determine virtually every aspect of a person’s life-their social rights, political rights, educational opportunities, and economic status.
The Group Areas Act of 1950
The Group Areas Act established residential and business sections in urban areas for each racial group, and members of other races were barred from living, operating businesses, or owning land in these designated zones. This led to thousands of Coloured, Black, and Indian residents being forcibly removed from areas classified for white occupation. The act effectively excluded people of colour from living in the most developed areas, which were restricted to Whites. It required many people of colour to commute large distances from their homes to work.
Laws controlling relationships and daily life
The Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act of 1949 made it illegal for a white person to marry someone of another race. The Population Registration Act of 1950 created a national system of racial classification that determined where a person could live, whether they had to carry a passbook to travel, and what education was available to them. The Immorality Amendment Act of 1950 criminalized sexual relationships between white people and those of other races.
The Reservation of Separate Amenities Act of 1953
This legislation mandated segregated public facilities. Beaches, parks, transportation, restrooms, and other public amenities were designated for specific racial groups. Signs reading “Whites Only” or “Non-Whites” became ubiquitous across South Africa.
The Bantu Education Act of 1953
The Bantu Education Act provided for state control of African schools, which had mostly been founded by missionary societies. The Ministry of Native Affairs designed a curriculum specifically intended to prepare Black South Africans for a subordinate position in society. Dr. Hendrik Verwoerd, then Minister of Native Affairs and later Prime Minister, infamously believed that Black South Africans should be educated only for the limited opportunities available to them under apartheid.
The Bantustan strategy and forced removals
A core element of what became known as “grand apartheid” was the creation of nominally independent homelands called Bantustans. The Pretoria government established ten Bantustans in South Africa, each designated for a specific ethnic group as defined by the apartheid government. These included Transkei, Bophuthatswana, Ciskei, Venda, Gazankulu, KaNgwane, KwaNdebele, KwaZulu, Lebowa, and QwaQwa.
The Bantu Authorities Act of 1951
The Bantu Authorities Act created separate government structures for Blacks and Whites and was the first legislation supporting the government’s plan for separate development in the Bantustans. It abolished the Natives Representative Council and replaced it with indirect rule through government-appointed leaders in regional, tribal, and territorial areas.
The Bantu Homelands Citizenship Act of 1970
Perhaps the most pernicious of all Bantustan legislation, this act stripped Black South Africans of their South African citizenship, depriving them of their few remaining political and civil rights in South Africa and declaring them to be citizens of these impoverished homelands instead. Under this system, Black South Africans would no longer be citizens of South Africa but rather foreign migrant laborers working on temporary permits in their own country.
Massive forced removals
From 1960 to 1983, the apartheid government forcibly moved 3.5 million Black South Africans in one of the largest mass removals of people in modern history. Between 1960 and 1983, people were removed from their homes and forced into segregated neighbourhoods, with most of these removals intended to restrict the Black population to the designated Bantustans.
One infamous example was Sophiatown, a vibrant, culturally significant suburb of Johannesburg. In 1955, thousands of police officers descended on the area and forcibly removed its Black residents. Sophiatown residents were forcefully removed to Meadowlands in Soweto. The entire neighborhood was demolished and replaced with a new white suburb named Triomf-Afrikaans for “Triumph.” Similarly, District Six in Cape Town, a lively mixed-population neighborhood, was razed after being designated for whites only in 1966, with at least 60,000 people relocated to barren outskirts.
Despite comprising over 70 percent of South Africa’s population, Black South Africans were confined to Bantustans that made up only 13 percent of the land-often mountainous, arid territories far from markets and infrastructure. These overcrowded, underdeveloped areas became what critics called “dumping grounds” for people deemed surplus to the labor market.
What do you think? How do historical systems of legal discrimination continue to shape societies long after their formal abolition? In what ways does understanding apartheid’s legal architecture help us recognize and resist modern forms of institutionalized inequality?
References
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid_Convention
- https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/convention-apartheid
- https://guide-humanitarian-law.org/content/article/3/apartheid-1/
- https://sahistory.org.za/article/natives-land-act-1913
- https://www.britannica.com/topic/Native-Lands-Act
- https://www.gov.za/news/events/commemorative-events/1913-natives-land-act-centenary
- https://artsandculture.google.com/story/the-1913-land-act-the-cornerstone-of-the-apartheid-africa-media-online/2AVRNAgYktjrKg
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_Registration_Act,_1950
- https://www.britannica.com/topic/Group-Areas-Act-of-1950-South-Africa
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_Areas_Act
- https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/apartheid-in-south-africa/
- https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/asia-and-africa/southern-african-history/bantustan
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantustan
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid
- https://overcomingapartheid.msu.edu/multimedia.php?kid=163-582-18
- https://historyrise.com/the-bantustan-system-and-independent-homelands/
Leave a Reply